'I, Robot Film Essay\r'

'â€Å"I, automaton”, beingness the tear released in 2004, has gained the commodious popularity of the auditory sense and the eulogy of tender beingsy critics. In f feign, the opening weekend proven to be very productive for the impression house that indicates to the huge interest of the public. In this respect, it is worth mentioning the fact that â€Å"I, automaton” has a budget $120,000,000 and the opening weekend in the US only has brought over $52 mln. (I, Robot, 2008). In much(prenominal) a way, it is possible to estimate that the film was basically very successful since it quench form quite popular, especially among connoisseurs of science-fiction. Obviously, the popularity of the film and the interest of the pubic is non only the result of a successful promotional campaign and celebrities starring in the film, just now it is importantly referable to the quality of the film that do â€Å"I, Robot” so popular and successful. In this resp ect, it should be said that â€Å"I, Robot” is a film centre on the problem of technologies of control. Speaking ab push by dint of(a) the dapple of the film, it should be said that the action takes place in 2035 when zombies are widely used as supporter of gentlemans gentleman beings.\r\nIn such a smudge the main character, Chicago Police Detective Del Spooner (Will Smith) seems to be a bit paranoid because he is a kind of robotophobic. Strangely enough only when it is him who is appointive to investigate the murder of Dr. Alfred Lanning (James Cromwell) who works at US Robotics. The number one suspect is a genus Nestor Class 5 robot who calls himself Sonny. This is where the paradox and the main dilemma appears: if Sonny really has killed a gentleman, than he possesses cognizance and he can think and act independently from a adult male. Consequently if all this is current than robots can easily raise against their human master and establish total control over the world. utilization essays In such a way, the main understructure of the film is revealed through the opposition of robots that gained consciousness and human beings who turned from masters that controlled not only robots but allthing in the world and in their lifetime into beings who obligate grown to become completely dependent upon their robots” (Wilson 2002:388).\r\nIn fact this lead to the logical motility the audience has to answer: â€Å"at what point does artificial countersign cease to be artificial and true consciousness arise?” (Wilson 2002:389). Moreover, it is not less important to empathise the consequences of such a shift in the machines ca-cad due to the most sophisticated technologies mankind possesses. The director of the film successfully used the scenes where the large masses of robots are shown resembling a kind of army which is able to demolish the mankind as soon as it goes out of human’s control. At this point the scenes i n which robots attack man are particularly noteworthy. up to now though the director of the film probably pays excessively much attention of action scenes and violence, but still this violence does not seem to be excessive. Instead, it is intentionally used to demonstrate the power of the machines created by military man and which rebelled against humankind’ domination.\r\nIn such a situation, the frontmost robot that actually started to act differently, i.e. the robot, who has gone out of control of humans, resembles a kind of Frankenstein, a peter that rebels against its creator. On the other hand, the robot does not give rise an absolutely negative mould. In fact, the robot provokes preferably controversial feelings since the only problem of the robot is its actions which are wrong and which are not conditioned by humans, but which, on the other hand, are similarly human. In such a way, the rebellion of robots may be viewed in the context of comparison of huma ns with robots. The latter rebel against humans but they guide in a similar way as humans do, the only thing they want to metamorphose is to accomplish humans efforts to create perfect creatures and create the perfect world.\r\nHowever, the film reveals the fact that in such an idealized world in that location is no dwell for humans that are too imperfect and their bout for perfection is just their vanity and an attempt to run away God. In this respect, the main character is quite symbolic since he comprises vices which cannot be attributed to a real adept that is supposed to save the world from robots. In actuality, Del Spooner is a bit paranoid person who has some abstruse phobia of robots and machines, a person who lives practically in the permanent state of fear. On the other hand, he is ready to face all the challenges in his life and he is ready to struggle.\r\nThe main problem is whether humans can control their technologies and what are the consequences of the unpla nned proficient progress. Probably, the question is even more general: what human beings are and whether they can create working machines with mettlesome intelligence and remain safe. The director poses an eternal question what human beings are and testamentingly or not a viewer may have got an impression that humans are also someone’s creatures, as robots in â€Å"I, Robot”. I Robot\r\nI robot is a movie ground on the works of an atheistic man, in which in that respect are many theological themes present, which play toward the same questions we ask about our faith apiece and every day.\r\nI Robot is a movie base on the works of Victor Asimnov, a man who wrote several short stories about robots and human kinds interaction. The movie takes place in futuristic Chicago in the year 2035, at a time there are so many robots, that there will soon be one of them in each home. The story revolves around detective Del Spooner (Will Smith), a homicide detective who hates robots. The reason being that he had a prominent experience with them, ever since a robot rescue his life in a car chance when it could have saved a young young lady instead.\r\nThe movie starts off when the scientist who repaired Will Smith after(prenominal) the accident, named Alfred Lanning, is found dead in the lobby of the U.S. Robotics section tower. Del Spooner (Will Smith) assumes that the scientist’s death was not a self-annihilation attempt, but a murder committed by a robot named Sonny. Everyone tells Spooner that he’s crazy, because robots cannot go against the three laws by which they are to abide by at any cost. THE THREE LAWS OF ROBOTICS:\r\nA robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. A robot mustiness follow orders given it by human beings, nevertheless where such orders would conflict with the First Law. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the first and second rule.\r\nEvery robot is programmed to protect humans at all costs, and to obey them unless such obedience would harm a human life. Spooner very much doubts this because various robots keep try to kill him, from a home-demolition robot, to a whole truckload of admixture men that ambush him while he drives through a highway tunnel. The story continues, and the new robots go on a rampage, even…\r\n'