Starbucks Case Accounting

Starbucks Case burst I Prior to reading Starbucks Form 10-K, please answer the undermentioned questions. Your answers should be shankd upon your frequent knowledge of Starbucks, gained from visiting their stores, buying their products and/or observing them in the marketplace. a. Up until the economic downturn (Fall of 2008) what do you believe was Starbucks development scheme? hold back triplet examples of proper(postnominal) actions ( egression initiatives) you observed Starbucks exe disrupte upon as part of their product st rungy? 1. Satu locate the U. S. arket Based on our observations, it seemed that Starbucks primary st castgy for developing was to modify the U. S. market. At wizard point there seemed to be a Starbucks at all corner, sometimes so close that one had to wonder why in the heck they were interruption stores within a brace dozen feet from for each one an naked(prenominal)(prenominal). 2. Expand internationally We presume that one of their return g oals was to expand abroad, specially if they began to realize they were great dealnibalizing their own established stores, so they credibly had to go outside of the U. S. o keep up their growth targets. 3. bankrupt complementary products/alternative taxation sources We withal think that around 2006-2007 was when they started to enkindle download fair to middling music and also began to sell CDs & books in stores which means they began to much aggressively add alternative revenue impart, beyond that of c takeee/drinks, to their m all locations. (Personally, I purchased a bottle of Starbucks c glumee liqueur around that time, which I lock a guidance necessitate because its non as good as early(a) coffee liqueurs such as Kahlua. b.How do you believe Starbucks measured their achievement in executing their growth strategy? Give four particular measures you might use to evaluate the victor of Starbucks growth strategy. Very likely that they were measuring it against yield of new stores opened, and gross revenue growth. We would probably use the following to evaluate the success of Starbucks growth strategy 1. Sales growth. 2. in ope dimensionn(p) Revenues. 3. Net income. 4. Return on pluss. The remaining sections of the case should be complete after you have read Starbucks Form 10-K and whatsoever other schooling deemed pertinent. lead off II Results of the audit by Starbucks outside independent accountant, view of Starbucks financial disciplineing ascendances and sedulousness particular proposition accounting. a. Who is Starbucks outside independent tender? Did Starbucks receive a qualified or unqualified (clean) audit report from their outside independent auditor for the 2010 mo engagementary twelvemonth end? a. Deloitte & Touche, LLP. b. Unqualified. b. What was Starbucks concerns coda in their report on inside control for financial reporting? What was the outside independent auditors cobblers brave out regarding managements revie w and assessment of financial reporting controls? . That their internal control over financial reporting was effective as of October 3, 2010. d. That Starbucks maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of October 3, 2010. c. How does Starbucks account for present humors? What mend do unredeemed gift cards have on the reported run income in each year? How does Starbucks accounting for unredeemed gift cards comp atomic number 18 to other retailers? e. Revenues for cards are recognized when tendered for payment, or upon redemption. Out hold watering balances are include in deferred revenue on the balance sheet.Balances on cards that are deemed marvellous to be redeemed, get recognized as mesh fill income. f. operational income is change magnitude by balances on cards thought unlikely to be redeemed therefore, it can be argued that direct income is being exaggerated by the addition of unlikely-to-be-redeemed card balances to illuminate interest inco me. g. Gift card balances by other retailers are probably carried as a li qualification (unearned revenue). When gift cards are not redeemed, some retailers return the balances to the ground where the card was issued assuming the unclaimed balance to be unclaimed shoes in some states.As seen above, Starbucks does carry outstanding balances as deferred revenue (a liability) as well, but once the cards are deemed unlikely to be redeemed, it treats the unclaimed balance as an asset. Part III Trend abbreviation of Sales and Earnings Growth During 2006 2010 Review Starbucks income statement and common sizing income statement for the age 2006 through 2010. Identify and comment on the study abbreviates in the growth in Starbucks gross gross sales and sugar, including a. Sales growth was Starbucks sales growth consistent or inconsistent over the above fivesome year block?Do you see signs of acceleration or slowing in Starbucks historic growth place? How does Starbucks sale s growth equalize to its pains norm outs? Are same store sales or the opening of new stores the much important situationor in driving Starbucks sales growth during this period? Do you believe Starbucks sale styles over the old few years will continue over the next twain to three years? Please interpret rationale for your belief. Starbucks sales growth was inconsistent over the above 5 year period. Data from the run short 5 years suggests that Starbucks growth rate is actually decelerating.Starbucks sales growth was below the industry sales growth. The industry has average 9. 25% over the abide 5 years time Starbucks averaged 7. 5% only. The opening of new stores is vital to Starbucks sales strategy. During 2006, 2007, and 2008, Starbucks added 2199, 2571, and 1669 inter straighten out stores. During the same years, sales grew by 22%, 21%, and 10% respectively. During 2009, Starbucks reduced 45 stores and their sales dropped by 7%. In 2010, Starbucks added 223 stores an d not surprisingly their sales step-upd by 10%. In our opinion, Starbucks sales will continue to grow but at a decreasing rate over the next 2 to 3 years.This projection is unintellectuald on historical sales info from the stand 5 years which suggest a deceleration of sales growth. Starbucks average sales growth for the last 5 years is 11%. In 2006, Starbucks sales grew by 22%. This suggests a deceleration of sales growth. b. make margins did gross margins expand, contract or hold stabilise over the period? What major factors account for the trend youve set? The gross margin has held steady over the last 5 years ranging anywhere from 55% to 59%. Gross margin is affected by sales and speak to of sales. c. run(a) expense make sure you look at operate(a) expenses in both absolute dollar landmarks and as a pct of sales. Did operate expenses grow slower, faster or at the same rate as revenues? Would you expect to see much leverage on Starbucks cost base, given their growth history? (Note operating leverage is demonstrated when a companys operating expenses grow at slower rate than its sales, thereby resulting in operating earnings growing faster than sales. ) Do you believe Starbucks cost base is more(prenominal) or lessly fixed, mostly variable or an equal mix of each?What implication does the structure of Starbucks cost base (i. e. % fixed / variable) have on the relationship between the growth rates of revenues and earnings? Make sure you present study to actualise your conclusion. operating(a) expenses have expectant at a high(prenominal) rate than revenues over the last 5 years. Revenues grew at an average of 7% while operating expenses have grown at an average of 11. 34%. Based on these number, we expect to see less leverage on Starbucks cost base as operating expenses are growing at a high rate than revenues.The fact that Starbucks operating expenses are growing at a higher(prenominal) rate than its revenues shows that Starbucks cost b ase is mostly variable. This is also prove by the income statement as most of Starbucks operating expenses are terms of Sales and Store operate expenses. Most of these are usually variable. Having more variable expenses usually means that earnings will not ineluctably grow at the same rate as revenues. This is demonstrated by the income statement from the last 5 years. Starbucks revenues and earnings have grown at different rates over each year of the last 5 years.The average earnings growth per year over the last 5 years is 12. 62% as compared to an average sales growth per year of 7. 5%. d. Operating income have operating earnings grown at the same rate, faster or slower than sales? What factors (e. g. gross margins, operating expense/charges) account for the trend youve identified? Be specific and forget fill-in for your answer. Operating income has grown at a faster rate than sales on a per year hind end over the last 5 years. Sales growth has averaged 7. 5% per year as compared to an operating income growth of 11. 75% per year during the same period.The reason that operating income has grown so fast is because Starbucks new-fashionedly do changes to its cost structure that made it more efficient. As per the 10-k statement filed with the SEC, Starbucks decreased its Cost of Sales by 260 basis points by making their supply chain process more efficient. This resulted in lower food, beverage, and opus packaging costs. Because of its sales leverage, Starbucks was also able to decrease its occupancy costs. Because of the reduced costs, Starbucks was able to have a higher operating income in 2010. This cause the 5 year average to jump up to 11. 75%.Also contributing to this growth was the fact that sales change magnituded at a higher rate than operating expenses. Therefore, operating income also went up at a higher rate than sales. e. Net Income has net income grown at the same rate, faster or slower than sales? What factors (e. g. gross margins, op erating expense, non-operating items) account for the trend youve identified? Be specific and provide dungeon for your answer. Net Income has affixd at a higher rate than sales also on a per year basis for the last five years. In fact, Net Income has pretty much reflect Operating Income in growth.The factors tied to Net Income are Sales, Operating Expenses, Interest, and Taxes. Taxes remained comparatively proportionate EBT each year. During each of the 5 years, Starbucks experienced a affirmatory interest income for 3 years and a negative for 2 years. This helped Starbucks cast up their Net Income. However, the factor that affected Net Income the most was Operating Expenses. Operating expenses grew at a slower rate than sales from 2006 to 2010. This resulted in Starbucks having a higher Operating Income which in turn resulted in a higher net income. Starbucks net income grew by 142. 2% in 2010 from the previous year. This self-aggrandising change resulted in the average net i ncome growth rate to increase to 12. 62%. During the same period, Sales has grown by 7. 5% and operating expenses grew by 7%. All of this contributed to the Net Income growing at a higher rate than sales. f. Earnings per serving Does Starbucks earnings per share increase/decrease at a rate consistent with revenue and net income. why is this? Do you expect this relationship to continue into the future? Starbucks EPS increases and decreases at a rate consistent with net income but not sales.This is because earnings per share are calculated by taking the net income and dividing that into the number of shares outstanding. As a result, there is a direct correlation with net income and not sales. We expect this relationship to continue in the future as long as the number of shares outstanding doesnt change drastically each year. Part IV compend of Operating Efficiency, liquid state and Solvency employ data included in the Form 10-K analyze Starbucks operating competency and liquidi ty. That is, answer the questions below.The ratio definitions use to calculate the figures in the Ratio Analysis table are described in the text and lecture notes. a. Operating efficiency Turnover ratios. In one paragraph, explain what the prises of turnover ratios kick downstairs about Starbucks. That is, for each ratio, discuss the trend, compare Starbucks ratio to the industry average (for receivables, inventory turnover and asset turnover only) and discuss whether the trend indicates improvements or deteriorations in operating efficiency. Can you think of any other measures that would be useful to assess Starbucks operational efficiency?Turnover ratios reveal that in 2010, Starbucks sales increased. Receivables turnover jumped up just about from previous years to 37. 31. The industrys 2009 median receivables turnover is meaning(a)ly higher than Starbucks at about 98. 64. This trend indicates that Starbucks made less sales on quote in 2010. It could also mean that Starbucks improved collecting on its accounts receivables however, since Starbucks average collection period ratio has not changed in the last three years (holding steady at about 11 days), there is no indication that collection on receivables has improved. The inventory turnover ratio of 7. 8, which slightly increased from 2009, also suggests a decrease in inventories, which is put uped by the drop of inventory assets shown on the balance sheet. This trend supports the observation that sales have increased significantly for Starbucks in 2010 which is always an improvement for any business. PP&E Turnover ratio of 4. 32, which increased from 2009, again, demonstrates higher sales since PP&E remained at similar levels as previous years per the balance sheet. nitty-gritty asset turnover, 1. 79, remained very close to last year, and is slightly less than the industry average, 1. 3. This shows Starbucks continues to generate sales at a level of almost double as much as they carry assets on their books. The fact that their asset turnover is slightly less than that of their competitors suggests that Starbucks may have more assets than their competitors. b. Liquidity In one paragraph, explain what the liquidity ratios ( afoot(predicate) ratio, quick ratio and exchange from trading operations ratio) reveal about Starbucks. Include an explanation of how the coin run for from operations ratio differs from the current and quick ratios. What is your conclusion egarding Starbucks liquidity spatial relation? With significant increases in 2010 in current ratio, 1. 55, and quick ratio, 0. 99, Starbucks is very liquid. truehearted ratio shows they have 1. 5 times current assets on the books as they do current liabilities. Likewise, the quick ratio shows they would be able to roll up current liabilities with their current assets. The money from operations ratio is . 96, which states that Starbucks cash from operations would not be enough to cover its current liabilities. This ra tio differs from the starting signal two in that it compares a cash hightail it item to a balance sheet item.It is an indication of a firms ability to pay off its current liabilities however, it is the most conservative liquidity ratio since it excludes all current assets except for the most liquid cash and equivalents. It tells that Starbucks would not quite be able to pay off all of its current liabilities with just its cash and equivalents, although it does come close. c. Solvency Interpret the mensurates of the relevant ratios and provide a conclusion regarding Starbucks ability to service its debt and risk of future insolvency. Does your conclusion change if you include off balance sheet debt.How much off balance sheet debt does Starbucks have as of the end of the most recent fiscal year? Starbucks solvency ratios suggest that it is in a soaked agency and would likely be able to service its debt as it shows low risk of future solvency. Its debt to equity ratio for 2010 of 0. 73 is at the concluding it has been in the recent five years. From 2009 Starbucks had a big increase in retained earnings, this pushed all solvency ratios including interest insurance coverage, return on assets, and return on equity up. ROA and ROE were manifold from 2009 to 0. 16 and 0. 28 respectively.Likewise, interest coverage also had a big jump due to a significant increase in earnings before interest and taxes. If we include off balance sheet debt, Starbucks debt to equity ratio increases a bit, but the trend still shows that this ratio has decreased significantly in 2010. The increase would not be enough to state that Starbucks runs a high risk of insolvency. Starbucks has $4,084. 2 in off balance sheet debt as of end of most recent fiscal year. (We assume that the numbers provided are in one million million millions). Part V Analysis of Cash Flow Refer to Starbucks cash flow statement a.During the past three years, what was Starbucks largest source of cash? What w ere Starbucks two largest uses of cash? a. For the past 3 years, the largest source of cash for Starbucks was Net earnings including non-controlling assets from its operating activities. Starbucks two largest uses of cash were additions to property, plant and equipment, as well as purchasing available for sale securities. It is stated in the 10-k that the major components of the PPE spending were remodeling and upgrading equipment in stores, as well as updating the IT infrastructure of the retail network. b.For the past three fiscal years, has Starbucks chief financial officer been adequate to origin its growth initiatives? If no, how has Starbucks funded the chief financial officer shortfalls to fund growth? a. As stated in the 10-K Starbucks believes that cash flows generated from operations and existing cash and short term targetments should be enough to support their core business activities. However, it is also stated that new business opportunities, vocalize ventures, and a cquisitions would have to utilize outside funding sources. Starbucks has augmented to their cash flows by heavily investing in available for sale securities, and purchasing US Agency and enthronization grade bonds.These investments, and outside financing, can be utilise to fund growth initiatives while chief financial officer can be used to support Starbucks core retail business. The 10K also mentions that the issuance of commercial-grade paper and its proceeds can be used for working detonator needs, treetopital expenditures, and other corporate purposes, including acquisitions and share purchases. c. Based on your review of Starbucks cash flow statement, has Starbucks growth been driven by organic growth or acquisitions? Provide support for your answer. a.Starbucks growth has been driven organically, with strong, steady growth in net earnings including non-controlling interests, and investing a large keep down of cash in property, plant, and equipment by opening new retail locations and upgrading existing stores and information systems. By utilizing CFO and short term investment earnings to support their core business, Starbucks has maintained a high growth, very successful retail operation. Acquisitions play a minor role compared to the growth and earnings from operating activities. d. If Starbucks continues to grow at its historic rates, does it appear that Starbucks CFO can fund this growth?If CFO isnt sufficient, how might Starbucks fund its future growth? a. Yes, it does appear that Starbucks CFO can fund its historic growth. This is stated in the 10k CFO and short term investments, as well as any potential future borrowings and the commercial paper program can support the existing core business as well as related to marketing support, product innovations, and new business opportunities related to the core business. If CFO is not sufficient to fund the historic growth, Starbucks can utilize channels within the investment and finance sections of the cash flow statement.Particularly, Starbucks can invest more heavily in short term investments, and utilize the commercial paper program. Additionally, Starbucks purchases available for sale securities heavily these could be sold in the future to fund any growth where CFO is not adequate to support the core business. e. During the past three fiscal years, what dollar amount of common storehouse did Starbucks buyback and what dollar amount of dividends did they pay? Why would Starbucks repurchase their own stock and/or pay a dividend? How does this impact Starbucks ability to fund future growth?How did Starbucks strategy with regard to share repurchases and dividends change during the past few years? Why did it change? a. In 2008, Starbucks repurchased $ 311. 4 million in common stock. In 2009, Starbucks did not repurchase any stock. In 2010, Starbucks repurchased $ 285. 6 million in common stock. Starbucks may want to repurchase their own stock so that they can increase their earnings per share ratio. This is especially true if Starbucks shares were perceived as undervalued, as Starbucks can repurchase the shares and hold them in the treasury for future reissuance at a higher price.Starbucks may be able to obtain more financing and loans with better earnings per share ratio as well. Dividends can be paid to shareholders to increase the value of their shares, and encourage other interested parties to purchase Starbucks shares. Paying dividends is a way to help impact substantiating future growth by making the purchase of Starbucks stock more profitable more people will want to buy it providing more cash for Starbucks to utilize. In the 10-k, it is stated that Starbucks had 1. 7 billion in CFO for 2010 compared to 1. 4 billion in fiscal 2009, and capital expenditures were approximately 440 million in both fiscal years.This left roughly $460 million for stock repurchases and dividends. Starbucks had to repay short term borrowings in 2008 and 2009, but di d not have to use cash for repayment in 2010. The cash that would have been used to payback short term borrowings could instead be used to repurchase stock and pay dividends. Thus, the strategy changed because Starbucks was able to operate without short term borrowings in 2010, and was able to pass on the excess case to shareholders. Part VI Market Valuation a. What is Starbucks net book value as of the end of the most recent fiscal year?What was Starbucks market capitalization as of that date? Why is there a discrimination in these two amounts? What specific items do you think interpret the difference? Starbucks net book value as of the end of 2010 fiscal year was $3,611,500,000 while its market cap was $19,270,826,000. The reason that the two numbers are different is because the net book value is calculated by taking the total assets of Starbucks and subtracting its intangible assets and total liabilities, while the market cap is calculated by multiplying the outstanding share s into the stock price.Because each is calculated exploitation 5 different numbers, there will almost always be a difference in the two numbers. b. Do you believe the difference between Starbucks net book value and market capitalization will increase or decrease in the future? What specific factors or trends identified in Starbucks financial information (or identified elsewhere) support your view? We believe that the difference between Starbucks net book value and market capitalization will decrease in the future.One of the biggest reasons for this is the fact that Starbucks restructured its Supply Chain process to lower costs. As a result, net income grew by 142% in 2010. This was a huge turnaround by Starbucks in one year and it can be attributed to the fact that leadership identified and implemented this cost saving mechanism. Another trend that indicates that Starbucks is on its way back is the fact that they opened more stores than they closed in the last 2 years. This strateg y is key to Starbucks succeeding. Third, Starbucks gross margin has remained constant in the last 5 years notwithstanding the down years.This shows that management knows how to cut down on costs when times are rough, or that despite financial downturns, people are still willing to pay for big-ticket(prenominal) coffee. Conclusion Refer to your responses in Part 1 How do the results of your abridgment in Parts II through VI support or contradict your original thoughts regarding Starbucks growth strategy and the success or misery of the three action areas (growth initiatives) you identified? Our assumption on their strategy to saturate the U. S. Market by building as any stores as practicable is supported by our discussion on sales growth, which shows that there is a direct correlation between sales revenue growth and net new stores opened. Likewise, in analyzing the CFO, we concluded that Starbucks has grown organically through their investment in PP&E, which corroborates our o riginal thoughts. Although they probably realized they were overdoing it with having a Starbucks on every corner, their growth strategy of increasing store numbers has been a success for the company as sales have also increased.Going forward, the contest will be to maintain high sales rates while being able to cover its large PP&E/overhead expenses. Although we didnt really analyze the impact of international expansion in our analysis above, according to the companys 10-K, operating income from international activities more than doubled from 2009 to 2010 however, this increase was mostly due to foreign currency translation among other things. Therefore, our original thoughts are not necessarily proven by the data that we analyzed. Finally, we stated that one of Starbucks growth strategies was to develop alternative revenue sources.As we looked deeper at the reasons for sales growth, we noticed that licensing and food service both were strong contributors to the increases in net rev enues. Our discussion on sales growth indirectly supports this hypothesis, since the increase in net revenues was affected by an increase in average value per transaction (as stated in the 10-K). This means that customers are not just buying coffee at the checkout stand because Starbucks is being successful at selling other complimentary goods on with their drinks. Therefore, this is definitely being a successful growth strategy for Starbucks.